It is nice to be somewhere remote, far away from civilization and offline, as we were on board SV Antigua until Wednesday (27th July). Without any connection to the outside world other than satellite-based communication, far from fit for real internet.
Back in Longyearbyen, this all changes. The world news are mostly depressing, but obviously not what this page is about. Compared to much of what is going on in the world, Spitsbergen is and remains a peaceful place without major troubles. But still, things happen here and many of them are not great at all.
One can only wonder what was got into some people who are working within tourism in Spitsbergen, steering ships or boats or being in responsible positions on them. Two French expedition ships (or small cruise ships, whatever you prefer) got their guns removed recently because they did not have the required papers. About 50 weapons in total! That can indeed raise an eyebrow or two. At least, mistakes made in this case were made on paper and not during navigation on the bridge or in the field, where major mistakes can have entirely different consequences.
As will become clear in this case, in case anyone may wonder. After the grounding of the Virgo in Fuglefjord a couple of weeks ago, the Ocean Atlantic, a major expedition ship (or: see above) operated by Albatross Expeditions, touched the ground (or ice?) somewhere. The incident was serious enough to have caused damage to the hull, involving ingression of water. And as if that had not yet been enough, the crew did not deem it necessary to inform the Norwegian maritime authority, who could have dispatched rescue forces to be on stand-by in the vicinity of the Ocean Explorer in case of an escalation. It is probably needless to say that such a report to the maritime authority would have been required by law, and talk of luck that the situation did not deteriorate. The crew on board was able to control the situation. Nevertheless, someone on board felt uncomfortable enough to make a phone call at some stage, and soon the Ocean Atlantic was escorted to Longyearbyen by a Norwegian coastguard vessel. Now the ship is anchored in Adventfjord, awaiting inspection. Earlier controls this year had already revealed more than 20 serious security flaws.
Comment: incredulous shaking of the head.
Ocean Atlantic in the port of Longyearbyen.
Less dramatic, but nevertheless serious and making one wonder, is the incident where a Zodiac fleet belonging to Hondius went to a small island in Kongsfjord to give their passengers an opportunity to see a polar bear. Witnesses claim that the boats were close enough to cause disturbance of the animal or even put people or the bear at risk, but this may be a matter of controversial debate; it is said that the boats were “at one time within 50 meters”, a distance that does not at all necessarily (but may) involve disturbance or even risk to life and limb of man or beast. It is not possible to say more about this aspect of the incident without further knowledge of relevant details.
But one thing is clear, unfortunately: the island in question is part of a bird sanctuary. From 15th May to 15th August, a minimum distance of 300 metres from the island’s (and neighbouring islands) shores are required for all traffic, including boats. This regulation has been in force for decades.
Comment: also here, one can only wonder how this could happen. The only explanation this author can think of is an astonishing lack of knowledge regarding relevant regulations. This should not have happened to the expedition staff of a ship operated by a comapany with decades of regional experience, an opinion shared by the chief operating officer of the company in question as reported by Svalbardposten. The incident is likely the debate about a certification scheme for guides, something which in itself is not necessary a bad thing at all, although this debate is not necessarily going a fruitful way either, but that is another issue.
As if 2 years of Covid-19 were not enough for all who want to or who need to travel: pilots of SAS are on strike since negotiations scheduled until yesterday (Monday) failed. Up to 250 SAS flights are expected to be cancelled now every day as long as the strike lasts.
That includes flights to and from Longyearbyen.
It is an issue that has kept Norway and Russia busy already for some weeks: a delivery for Barentsburg, said to include mainly food, is kept on hold at the border between Russia and north Norway. The delivery was to be transported over land to Tromsø and from there by ship to Barentsburg.
Barentsburg during brighter times (here in 2019).
But due to the sanctions introduced after the Russian war of aggression and destruction began in February, Norway does not allow the goods into the country. The Spitsbergen treaty guarantees all signatory parties – this includes Russia – free access to Svalbard, but according to Norwegian authorities, this does not automatically include the right to chose a route through the Norwegian mainland. Norwegian officials say that Russia at any time has the opportunity to ship goods from their own harbours to Barentsburg. Svalbard ports are not included in the ban on Russian ships in Norwegian ports, and officials indicate that Norway would consider an excemption to the ban on Russian planes on Norwegian airports if the Russian side filed an application for a flight to Longyearbyen.
The Russian reaction is mainly irritation, political threats – recently, Russian representatives have repeatedly pointed out that Norway breaks the Spitsbergen treaty – and allegedly cyberattacks. There have been several cyberattacks on public Norwegian websites recently, which Norwegian authorities associate with Russian hacker groups, according to Svalbardposten and other Norwegian media channels.
At some stage, Russian representatives raised concerns about a serious shortage of supplies in Barentsburg, which was described as an overreaction by Norway. Now it is said that the supply in Barentsburg is stable, due to deliveries from other sources, according to NRK.