Well, “bad times” is clearly a very relative description of life in Longyearbyen. We are having a good life. No bombs are falling from the sky. Just rain. But, hey … rain! In March! And far too much, and a large proportion of the white beauty around is is just melted and flown away during the last couple of days.
A strong low pressure system further south in the north Atlantic has pumped a lot of warm air up north. This warm air incursion brings wind, rain and melting temperatures. Far more of all of these than we actually appreciate.
Our little world up here is melting.
Longyearbyen: rain and meltwater turn streets into little lakes.
This was at least our impression for several days, wherever you turned the eye. Water was falling down from the sky, water turned the snow grey, then dark and finally into water, creating lakes on flat tundra areas. Water broke through the snow in rivers that should remain frozen for several months still.
Rubber boots were the best choice for a little walk. It happens quickly that you make one wrong step and your foot disappears in a deep hole of slush, a very cold and unpleasant mixture of snow and meltwater. On the other hand, it can be slippery and smooth as glass just a step further. It is very popular in Norway to use spikes. A great invention, they have certainly saved many people from broken legs and what not.
Drainages had to be created in many places to prevent the rivers from flooding.
Normal routine in May and June, but very uncommon in March.
For anything further away, any tours out into the arctic winterwonderland of Spitsbergen in the late winter: it is pretty much the only reasonable option to wait until Spitsbergen actually is a winterwonderland again. It wasn’t for days on end, and it still isn’t at the time of writing. Winter will beyond any doubt return. It is not gone, it is just taking a break. It will be colder again, the rivers will freeze again, lakes will turn into ice.
The question is if we get enough snow again to tour reasonably out there in the wild, filling the many dark gaps where the tundra is now free of snow. Let’s hope so, in the interest of all who are coming up here with dreams of the arctic winter. There are many of them in March and April.
Snow mobile routes have turned into slushy snow swamps and lakes. If you drive here, you risk getting stuck and damaging the vegetation under the slush.
Until the snow melt comes in May and finishes this wintern for good.
It is, for good reason, not allowed to drive on natural ground unless it is frozen AND snow-covered. There are those who take a liberal approach to this rule at the end of the season or during warm weather spells, to put it mildly – although it is legally binding. The result looks like this and it will take many years without further disturbance to for the vegetation to recover (Adventdalen, next to the road. Picture taken in june 2019).
The question will inevitably come up: is this now weather or climate change? My short answer: it has aspects of both. Weather and climate are hard to separate when it comes to any given meteorological event. Both are just different perspectives, different time scales, for pretty much the same collection of phenomena which altogether describe the atmosphere, especially its lower layers (that’s where we usually are). Such as temperature, precipitation, wind, air pressure and humidity, to name some of the most important ones. Weather is what you can see, feel and measure here and now. If you collect the same data over many years and turn them into averages and other statistical values, then you take the climate perspective.
So, in this given case, it is hard to say if it would have happend without climate change. Science has made important advances in recent years regarding such questions, so it would be interesting to hear an expert’s opinion or even see the results of scientific modelling of this week’s warm air incursion in Spitsbergen.
All I can do here is try to come up with some more or less educated guessing. The tendencies that climate change create for this part of the Arctic appear to be pretty clear: more frequent weather changes, more strong wind, more precipitation, especially more rain in the winter.
There are those who will say now that winter rain was not completely unheard of 100 years ago, and yes, that is true. But both the frequency and the intensity of these events are increasing now, and current climate change makes an important contribution to this development, or rather: the decisive one.
So, chances are that we would not have had this week’s warm air incursion up here without climate change, or at least that it would have been much less intense. We have had days of rain and temperatures up to around 5 degrees centigrade – above freezing! In March! I still can’t really believe it.
Also locals who have seen many Spitsbergen winters watch the weather with astonisment and very little amusement these days. And those who came up exactly this week to enjoy the arctic winterwonderland – well, what can I say. My pity is with them.
Against the background of Putin’s aggressive war in the Ukraine, the local tourism inter-trade organisation Svalbard Reiselivsråd encouraged the member companies not to spend money in the Russian settlements in Spitsbergen, Barentsburg and Pyramiden.
Popular in the past, now controversial: the brewerey in Barentsburg.
It was just a few days ago that Svalbard Reiselivsråd initially made a different decision, arguing that boycotts and sanctions should be measures between governments and states, but not on a local level. The recent turnaround came because many pointed out that the income generated in the Russian settlements benefits the owner of the settlements including all touristic offers and services: the Russian state-owned Trust Arktikugol, or in other words: the Russian government, which now leads a brutal and illegal war in the Ukraine.
Svalbard Reiselivsråd does not advise against tours to Barentsburg and Pyramiden, just from spending money there. Tours especially to Barentsburg used to be very popular before the recent large-scale Russian invasion started. These excursions usually included a local meal and an opportunity to buy souvenirs, including locally made ones. Many tour operators will now stop this practice.
But not all: also the new decision is controversial. There are those tour operators who argue that such boycotts will hit the wrong people, namely the local population – which includes many Ukrainians – rather than the regime in Moscow.
Svalbard Reiselivsråd makes only recommendations to the member companies, but these recommendations are not binding. Every tour operator will decide individually if they will continue tours to the Russian settlements and if they continue to buy and pay for local services.
The sun festival (solfest) is an important highlight in the annual calendar for many in Longyearbyen. It is traditionally celebrated on 08 March, when the first direct rays reach Skjæringa, the oldest part of Longyearbyen. On this day, a large crowd comes together at the stairs of the old hospital (which does not exist anymore) close to the church.
Sun festival (Solfest) in Longyearbyen.
This was also what happened in good tradition this time, although clouds on the southern horizon threatened to spoil the event. Many locals and certainly also a number of tourists gathered to celebrate the return of the light. The traditional programme includes singing, and when the sun was fighting to get through around 12.45 hours, she was lively cheered to until she indeed finally came out, to everybodies great delight!
Sun festival in Longyearbyen: “Here comes the sun” 🙂
Talk of luck – soon, the horizon disappeared again behind a grey curtain of clouds.
The sun festival is actually nmore than “just” the 08th of March, it is a whole week with a series of various cultural events. Some of them, such as the traditional revye that always comes with the solfest, have to be postponed by several weeks because too many of the artists are currently fighting Covid-19 🙁
While the Russian war is raging in the Ukraine, many are asking in Longyearbyen how to deal with the Russian neighbours in Barentsburg, where part of the population is Ukrainian, and the largely abandoned settlement of Pyramiden.
The important winter tourism season has started, and the many tourism companies in Longyearbyen were looking forward to the season after two very difficult corona years. Day trips to Barentsburg have, so far, been amongst the most popular offers; Pyramiden is also an important destination, although less frequently visited than Barentsburg because if it further away.
Now many in the industry are wondering how to deal with these offers considering the Russian aggression, war and crimes in the Ukraine and the international reactions. The local tourism inter-trade organisation Svalbard Reiselivsråd has taken the question upn and discussed it between their members and with authorities.
Barentsburg: usually a popular destination, now controversial.
As a result, Svalbard Reiselivsråd does not recommend to boykott the Russian settlements. The organisation argues that sanctions should be measures on a governmental level but not on a local, private sector level, where a boykott is more likely to hit people locally rather than the Russian government and others who are responsible for the current war and crime in the Ukraine. Svalbard Reiselivsråd indicates that they understood from Oslo authorities that a normal relationship is desired on a local level, according to Svalbardposten.
Some members had argued for a boykott of the Russian settlements, and clients had cancelled their bookings. According to Svalbard Reiselivsråd, it is up to every company not to offer trips to Barentsburg or Pyramiden, and it is anyway up to every tourist to book a tour to these settlements or not.