spitzbergen-3
fb  Spitsbergen Panoramas - 360-degree panoramas  de  en  nb  Spitsbergen Shop  
Marker

Grumantbyen

Map Grumantbyen

Map of Grum­ant­by­en at the time of maxi­mum acti­vi­ty.
Only the buil­dings drawn in black to still exist (as of 2020) as ruins that may col­lap­se at any time. The grey buil­dings do not exist any­mo­re, or just in shape of a few scat­te­red remains or bare­ly visi­ble foun­da­ti­ons. Also the piers do not exist any­mo­re.
The ori­gi­nal map did not inclu­de any topo­gra­phy (con­tours, river), which made it dif­fi­cult to match the map with the limi­ted remains that are still the­re. A bit of gues­sing is invol­ved as long as no fur­ther sources or more detail­ed maps are avail­ab­le. So this is real­ly just a sketch map: ori­en­ta­ti­on is not abso­lute­ly pre­cise and allo­ca­ti­on of the yel­low dots, which mark the posi­ti­ons whe­re the pan­ora­ma pho­tos on this site were taken, is just appro­xi­ma­te.
Author’s drawing, based on a sketch in Hoel (1996, more details at the end of the page).

Grumantbyen landscape

Grum­ant­by­en is situa­ted in a steep val­ley near the shore, under steep slo­pes.
The ter­rain was a source of fre­quent dif­fi­cul­ties.

Pan­ora­mas

  1. Grum­ant­by­en
  2. Eas­tern end of rail­way
  3. Memo­ri­al
  4. Rail­way track, tanks or boi­lers
  5. Rail­way track, mine ent­ran­ce
  6. Rail­way track, mine ent­ran­ce
  7. Cen­tral area
  8. Buil­ding (insi­de)
  9. Wes­tern buil­ding (ent­ran­ce)
  10. Wes­tern buil­ding (insi­de)
  11. View over Grum­ant­by­en

Pan­ora­ma 1 – Grum­ant­by­en

1912 and fol­lowing years: Grumant – The tra­ding house A.G. Aga­fel­off & Co

Several expe­di­ti­ons were sent out from Rus­sia to inves­ti­ga­te and secu­re coal occur­ren­ces in Spits­ber­gen from 1912. The first one was led by Vla­di­mir Rus­a­nov, but he disap­peared later during the same sum­mer tog­e­ther with the expe­di­ti­on ship, the Her­ku­les, and most of the other expe­di­ti­on mem­bers in the nor­the­ast pas­sa­ge. But Rudolf L. Samoi­lo­witsch and two other mem­bers had left the expe­di­ti­on in Spits­ber­gen. They retur­ned safe­ly with at least some results of their work. Samoi­lo­witsch beca­me a lea­ding figu­re of Rus­si­an arc­tic rese­arch and he led the Rus­si­an expe­di­ti­ons to Spits­ber­gen until 1915. Based on the work done in 1912, he secu­red several are­as, inclu­ding Cole­s­buk­ta and the coast of Isfjord to the east, whe­re Grumant (Grum­ant­by­en) was later estab­lis­hed. The tra­ding house A.G. Aga­fel­off & Co, foun­ded by mer­chants in in Ark­han­gelsk, was the dri­ving for­ce behind the­se acti­vi­ties.

Grumantbyen Umgebung

Access to Grum­ant­by­en from the sea is limi­ted by the steep and expo­sed shore to peri­ods with good con­di­ti­ons.
The­re is a lot of dan­ge­rous scrap metal in the shal­low water near the shore.

But the Rus­si­an acti­vi­ties in Spits­ber­gen cea­sed after 1915. See The ear­ly years of Bar­ents­burg, Colesbukta/Grumant and Pyra­mi­den for fur­ther details about the­se ear­ly years.

Pan­ora­ma 2 – Eas­tern end of rail­way

From 1920 onwards: The Anglo Rus­si­an Grumant (ARG)

In 1920, the Anglo Rus­si­an Grumant Com­pa­ny Ltd was foun­ded in Lon­don. The direc­tor, mining inge­nieur Gre­go­ry Mikhai­l­o­vitsj Nachim­son, had been part­ner in the tra­ding house Grumant – A.G. Aga­fel­off & Co sin­ce 1918 and knew their claims in Spits­ber­gen. It appears plau­si­ble that he wan­ted to secu­re the claims by moving the rights from Rus­sia, whe­re revo­lu­ti­on and collec­ti­vi­sa­ti­on were posing poten­ti­al thre­ats against the company’s inte­rests, to a coun­try that he felt was bet­ter sui­ted to take care of the busi­ness. But this is only spe­cu­la­ti­on. In any case, the ARG sent a first expe­di­ti­on with 21 mem­bers in 1920. A house was soon built on the Isfjord coast in Grum­ant­da­len to the east of the river to pro­vi­de accom­mo­da­ti­on and tech­ni­cal infra­st­ruc­tu­re was estab­lis­hed to the west of the river: a power sta­ti­on (die­sel), coal sto­rage, pier and a rail­way track to the mining area. The first coal was alrea­dy mined in 1920 at a seam that crop­ped out at 35 metres abo­ve sea level on the west side of the val­ley. 2000 tons of coal were ship­ped during that first year, and the sett­le­ment was deve­lo­ped fur­ther until 1925.

Pan­ora­ma 3 – Memo­ri­al

A litt­le memo­ri­al south of the sett­le­ment area. The back­ground is unknown.

Infor­ma­ti­on is scar­se, but a few num­bers may give an idea of the sca­le of the acti­vi­ties, which were con­ti­nuous and pro­duc­ti­ve for a cou­p­le of years, alt­hough not on a very lar­ge sca­le:

Popu­la­ti­on (total)Women/childrenCoal pro­duc­tion (tons)Ship­ped coal (tons)
Sum­mer 19202120002000
Win­ter 1920-2138-/-
Sum­mer 192145?7000
Win­ter 1921-2222-/-
Sum­mer 192220??
Win­ter 1922-23?-/-
Sum­mer 1923200?
Win­ter 1923-2425-/-
Sum­mer 192490?16000
Win­ter 1924-2566-/-
Sum­mer 1925?20200?
Win­ter 1925-2642-/-
Sum­mer 1926Gut 809000?
Win­ter 1926-27Nur Wach­mann­schaft-/-
Sum­mer 19276?

The pro­duc­tion is given, as far as at all avail­ab­le, as annu­al pro­duc­tion, without any fur­ther refe­rence to sum­mer or win­ter pro­duc­tion. The­re was no ship­ping in win­ter. Data from Hoel (1966): Sval­bards his­to­rie.

Pan­ora­ma 4 – Rail­way track, tanks or boi­lers

Acti­vi­ties in 1923 con­cen­tra­ted on the infra­st­ruc­tu­re, and for a while the­re was no coal pro­duc­tion.

Data are not com­ple­te, but the total pro­duc­tion from 1920 to 1924 appears to have been 33,000 tons, while the capi­tal used amoun­ted to 90,000 Pound ster­ling during the same peri­od.

1926 and fol­lowing years: the end of the Anglo Rus­si­an Grumant

The col­lap­se of coal pri­ces on the world mar­ket in the midd­le of the 1920s brought mining com­pa­nies in Spits­ber­gen and else­whe­re into dif­fi­cul­ties. The ARG was not able to con­ti­nue her ope­ra­ti­ons bey­ond 1925. Only a small group win­te­red in 1926-27 to guard the pro­per­ty, and 6 peop­le whe­re in Grumant in the sum­mer of 1927 for some basic work: a mana­ger, a cook, a fore­man and 3 miners. In late 1927, the ARG was for­ced to ter­mi­na­te all ope­ra­ti­ons in Spits­ber­gen and to sell the pro­per­ty and the rights. 62,000 tons of coal had been pro­du­ced until then.

Pan­ora­ma 5 – Rail­way track, mine ent­ran­ce

1931 and fol­lowing years: the Rus­si­an era begins – first Sojuslje­s­prom, then Trust Ark­ti­ku­gol

In the sum­mer of 1931, the Rus­si­an com­pa­ny Sojuslje­s­prom star­ted mining on the Grumant field. The ice­brea­ker Sibi­ria­koff arri­ved on 12 July from Arkan­gelsk with 80 peop­le, inclu­ding 12 women. Most of the workers came from the coal mines in the Donezk area in the Ukrai­ne and they were well paid (NOK 300,-/month, with free accom­mo­da­ti­on and food).

Grumant Überblick

View over Grumant as it was in 2020.

The workers star­ted immedia­te­ly to build several houses, inclu­ding two buil­dings with accom­mo­da­ti­on. Due to the dif­fi­cult har­bour con­di­ti­ons on the expo­sed coast, a plan exis­ted from the begin­ning to use Cole­s­buk­ta for ship­ping.

Ano­t­her 117 workers, with 10 women amongst them, arri­ved at Colesbukta/Grumant in late July. Soon, accom­mo­da­ti­on and a radio sta­ti­on were built. Two baracks were rea­dy at the end of the sum­mer with enough space in each to house 100 peop­le, and a club house and a hos­pi­tal. Exten­si­ve work still had to be done befo­re pro­duc­tion could be resu­med in the mine.

Old tank/boiler

Old tank/boiler (?) behind the buil­dings.

The immedia­te com­men­ce­ment of the works by Sojuslje­s­prom is remar­kab­le, becau­se it was for­mal­ly still the ARG Ltd. who held the rights to the Grumant coal field. On 17 Novem­ber 1931, the­se rights were taken over by the Trust Ark­ti­ku­gol, a Rus­si­an sta­te-owned com­pa­ny that was deve­lo­ping coal and other geo­lo­gi­cal resour­ces on Russia’s north coast.

Pan­ora­ma 6 – Rail­way track, mine ent­ran­ce

1931 and fol­lowing years: buil­ding and mining

Not much is known about the ope­ra­ti­ons in Colesbukta/Grumant in 1931 and the fol­lowing years. The­re is some data given by Adolf Hoel in his 3 volu­me stan­dard work Sval­bards His­to­rie. Hoel (15 May 1879 – 19 Febru­a­ry 1964) had good access to anything avail­ab­le in Nor­way during his times, but for the Rus­si­an ope­ra­ti­ons, all he had were the more or less annu­al reports from the inspec­tions of the Nor­we­gi­an Berg­mes­ter (Nor­we­gi­an Direc­to­ra­te of Mining) who was the legal aut­ho­ri­ty for all mining, regard­less of natio­na­li­ty, in Spits­ber­gen. The Berg­mes­ter visi­ted all rele­vant mines on an annu­al basis as much as pos­si­ble. Hence, we know at least that the Trust Ark­ti­ku­gol put a lot of resour­ces into the acti­vi­ties in Spits­ber­gen, espe­cial­ly Bar­ents­burg and Grumant, strai­gh­ta­way. The Trust cal­cu­la­ted with an annu­al pro­duc­tion of 120,000 tons. Until 1962, Grumant was far more important for the Trust Ark­ti­ku­gol than Pyra­mi­den, at least jud­ged by popu­la­ti­on and coal pro­duc­tion. Con­si­de­ring the­se key figu­res, the dou­ble sett­le­ment of Grumant/Colesbukta was also ahead of Bar­ents­burg in some years.

Building furthest west in Grumant, entrance

Ent­ran­ce to the buil­ding fur­thest west in Grumant.

As the sources are scar­se and not easi­ly avail­ab­le, I want to repro­du­ce tho­se data that are avail­ab­le here.

Popu­la­ti­onThe­re­of women/childrenCoal pro­duc­tion (tons)Coal ship­ped (tons)
Win­ter 1931-32??10000
Sum­mer 1932225??
Win­ter 1932-33?17011
Sum­mer 1933??0 (Betriebs­s­top)?
Win­ter 1933-34230?38643
Win­ter 1934-35190 Berg­ar­bei­ter?
Sum­mer 193531255/75050541462
Win­ter 1935-36350??
Sum­mer 1936300?7513163909
Sum­mer 193739064/677749?
Sum­mer 193840758/1257984?
Sum­mer 193946756/12?
Sum­mer 194042675/21
Sum­mer 1941609?

Data taken from Hoel (1966): Sval­bards his­to­rie.

Pan­ora­ma 7 – Cen­tral area

The older buil­dings in Grumant were remo­ved until 1932 and repla­ced with new ones that could accom­mo­da­te up to 400 peop­le. The sum­mer of 1932 was used to work on the infra­st­ruc­tu­re. The­re was no plan to put gre­at effort into har­bour faci­li­ties at Grumant. Initi­al­ly, coal was to be trans­por­ted to ships out in the fjord by bar­ges and the ide­as was to use the har­bour in Cole­s­buk­ta later, but both that har­bour and a reli­able con­nec­tion bet­ween Grumant and Cole­s­buk­ta still had to be built.

Western building, staircase

The stair­ca­se in the wes­tern­most buil­ding in Grumant
has obvious­ly seen bet­ter times in the past.

Ope­ra­ti­ons in Grumant were tem­pora­ri­ly cea­sed in 1933 becau­se the ter­rain cau­sed too many dif­fi­cul­ties; the Trust hoped that coal occur­ren­ces in Cole­s­buk­ta would turn out to be good enough to start mining from that end. At that time, infra­st­ruc­tu­re in Grumant was rea­dy to sup­ply 250 peop­le with accom­mo­da­ti­on, power and ever­ything else that was nee­ded for a regu­lar dai­ly life, such as a club house, admi­nis­tra­ti­on, radio sta­ti­on and die­sel-based power sta­ti­on. Soon, mining was resu­med again in Grumant.

Westernmost building, corridor

Cor­ri­dor in the wes­tern­most buil­ding in Grumant.

190 miners and an unknown num­ber of sur­face staff spent the win­ter of 1934-35 in Grumant. The num­ber of peop­le working on the sur­face was usual­ly at least equal or even excee­ded the num­ber of tho­se who actual­ly worked in the mine. The pro­por­ti­on miners/total popu­la­ti­on was often near 1:3.

For com­pa­ri­son: 1447 peop­le lived in Bar­ents­burg during the win­ter of 1934-35, inclu­ding 200 women.

Pro­duc­tion work was going on at 2 coal seams, each with a thic­kness near 60 cm. They were sepa­ra­ted by a sand­stone lay­er which was also 60 cm thick. The pro­duc­tion area was 18 metres below sea level. In 1937, work was star­ted to pre­pa­re a new mine on the east side of the val­ley.

Old mine entrance

Old mine ent­ran­ce.

A new power sta­ti­on had to be built in 1938 becau­se the old one had burnt down after a short cir­cuit on 14 Decem­ber 1937. The Nor­we­gi­an mining com­pa­ny Store Nor­ske in Lon­gye­ar­by­en was able to sup­ply two gene­ra­tors that dated back to the Ame­ri­can times of Lon­gye­ar City (until 1916) on a short noti­ce. Without this deli­very, all ope­ra­ti­ons in Grumant would have come to a com­ple­te stop until at least the fol­lowing sum­mer, but as it was, the inter­rup­ti­on was limi­ted to 4 weeks. The new power sta­ti­on was equip­ped with a 300 kw die­sel gene­ra­tor and it was enlar­ged in 1939. In the same year, a tun­nel was built for the river in the sett­le­ment area to gain space for coal sto­rage.

The­re is no infor­ma­ti­on about the coal pro­duc­tion of the indi­vi­du­al Rus­si­an sett­le­ments in 1939, but a total of 313,246 tons was ship­ped (the­re was no pro­duc­tion yet in Pyra­mi­den, so the who­le pro­duc­tion was from Bar­ents­burg and Grumant).

The second world did initi­al­ly not influ­ence the mining sett­le­ments in Spits­ber­gen.

In 1940, a two-storey buil­ding was rai­sed on the west side of the Grumant val­ley. The mine on the west side of the val­ley was aban­do­ned and coal pro­duc­tion was moved to the east side of the val­ley. The pro­duc­tion of the indi­vi­du­al sett­le­ments in 1940 is not known, but 269,729 tons were ship­ped in total.

Pan­ora­ma 8 – Buil­ding (insi­de)

1941 and fol­lowing years: evacua­ti­on and dest­ruc­tion

The Ger­man attack on the Sov­jet Uni­on on 22 June 1941 was a major tur­ning point for all sett­le­ments in Spits­ber­gen. All of them were evacua­ted and important infra­st­ruc­tu­re and coal reser­ves were des­troy­ed against local pro­test. Work had con­ti­nued in Grumant during the sum­mer of 1941, but the­re was no ship­ping, so a lot of coal had been stored. 609 peop­le were living in Grumant at that time: the lar­gest popu­la­ti­on the place had had until then.

183,674 tons of coal were pro­du­ced in the Rus­si­an mines in Spits­ber­gen in total in 1941 until 1 August, but only 109,414 tons were ship­ped. The sett­le­ments were evacua­ted in ear­ly Sep­tem­ber 1941. The inha­bi­tants of Bar­ents­burg, Colesbukta/Grumant and Pyra­mi­den were taken to Ark­han­gelsk.

River, Grumantbyen

Grumant is divi­ded into 2 parts by the river.

The Ger­man Kriegs­ma­ri­ne (navy) ran a lar­ge attack on Spits­ber­gen on 8 Sep­tem­ber 1943. Bar­ents­burg was almost com­ple­te­ly des­troy­ed and only a few buil­dings remai­ned in Grumant after that attack.

After the war: recon­struc­tion from late 1946

Recon­struc­tion of the Rus­si­an sett­le­ments did not com­mence befo­re Novem­ber 1946. 120 peop­le were busy to put Grumant back into ope­ra­ti­ve mode again in the sum­mer of 1947. Five smal­ler houses and one lar­ger one were soon rea­dy, but the mine was still des­troy­ed. The work­for­ce was rai­sed up to 200 in autumn. Coal was desper­ate­ly nee­ded in nort­hern Rus­sia.

Bach, Grumantbyen

The eas­tern­most buil­ding of tho­se that were still stan­ding in 2020 appeared so dan­ge­rous that I just took a pho­to through the win­dow.

The Rus­si­an sett­le­ments had a total popu­la­ti­on of 1200 during the win­ter of 1947-48, but it is not known how this popu­la­ti­on was divi­ded onto the indi­vi­du­al pla­ces. Recon­struc­tion work was still going on in Grumant in 1948, but lar­ge parts of the infra­st­ruc­tu­re were func­tio­n­al again, inclu­ding a litt­le hos­pi­tal and the die­sel power sta­ti­on, and coal pro­duc­tion was taken up again. A pier and 4 houses had been built in Cole­s­buk­ta, whe­re geo­lo­gi­cal inves­ti­ga­ti­ons were car­ri­ed out.

The litt­le ice­brea­ker Her­ku­les sank with 25 souls on board in Decem­ber 1948, pro­bab­ly during a storm near Bear Island (Bjørnøya). The Her­ku­les had been sta­tio­ned in Spits­ber­gen to pro­vi­de trans­port bet­ween the sett­le­ments, and her loss must have been a hea­vy blow to the small com­mu­nities.

Pan­ora­ma 9 – Wes­tern buil­ding (ent­ran­ce)

1949 and fol­lowing years: rou­ti­ne ope­ra­ti­on

The rebuil­ding pha­se was com­ple­ted in Grumant in 1949. The­re were lar­ge, two-storey woo­den buil­dings for accom­mo­da­ti­on, a bath house with sepa­ra­te sec­tions for women and men, admi­nis­tra­ti­on, can­te­en, warm sto­rage and hos­pi­tal. The plan to build a cable­way bet­ween Grumant and Cole­s­buk­ta had been aban­do­ned, but a way bet­ween the sett­le­ments had been com­ple­ted. The popu­la­ti­on was near 600 peop­le, 160-170 of which were working in the mine and 48 in Cole­s­buk­ta. The num­ber was incre­a­sed up to 965 in the autumn of 1949. The­re was no mining in Cole­s­buk­ta, but geo­lo­gi­cal inves­ti­ga­ti­ons were con­ti­nued. The­re were 3 lar­ge buil­dings and a small one in Cole­s­buk­ta, and a pig­ge­ry, har­bour and oil tanks.

The total popu­la­ti­on of the Rus­si­an sett­le­ments (Bar­ents­burg, Colesbukta/Grumant, Pyra­mi­den) in autumn 1949 was 2438 peop­le, inclu­ding 51 child­ren. The total coal pro­duc­tion was 125,000 tons, of which 105,466 were ship­ped.

Railway, Grumantbyen

Eas­tern end of the litt­le rail­way in Grumant. From 1952, it was con­nec­ted to Cole­s­buk­ta.

In the win­ter of 1949-50, mining was con­ti­nued east of the Grumant val­ley in a nort­her­ly direc­tion, but geo­lo­gi­cal faults which dis­lo­ca­ted the rocks cau­sed incre­a­sing dif­fi­cul­ties. At the same time, work was done on a rail­way con­nec­tion bet­ween Grumant and Cole­s­buk­ta. this rail­way was almost finis­hed in 1951, only 140 m of tun­nel blas­ting remai­ned to be done.

248.791 tons of coal were ship­ped from the Rus­si­an sett­le­ments in 1951. The­re are no fur­ther details regar­ding the pro­duc­tion in the indi­vi­du­al mines.

Railway, Grumantbyen

Steel scrap at the eas­tern end of the rail­way in Grumant.

In 1952, the Nor­we­gi­an Berg­mes­ter (mining aut­ho­ri­ty, see abo­ve) was denied access to the Rus­si­an mines for the first time, a new move in the rela­ti­ons­hips bet­ween Rus­si­ans and and Nor­we­gi­ans, which was other­wi­se descri­bed as good and friend­ly by Hoel, based on the Bergmester’s reports.

The rail­way Cole­s­buk­ta-Grumant was final­ly in ope­ra­ti­on, and the first loads of coal had been trans­por­ted over­land to Cole­s­buk­ta to sup­ply the power sta­ti­on over the­re. 40 minu­tes were nee­ded for a distance of 8 kilo­me­tres; one train had 30 cars, each of which could take 3 tons of coal.

Pan­ora­ma 10 – Wes­tern buil­ding (insi­de)

1954 and fol­lowing years: dif­fi­cul­ties with faults

It requi­red a lot of effort in 1954-55 to build a way around a major geo­lo­gi­cal fault (crack that dis­pla­ces rocks) east of Grumant. The­se works were con­ti­nued until 1958, but pro­duc­tion was con­ti­nued to the south and east at the same time. In 1958, pro­duc­tion could final­ly be con­ti­nued to the east of the fault.

A new house for accom­mo­da­ti­on was built in 1959. A new bath and laund­ry house and were in con­struc­tion in 1959 and rea­dy in 1960.

Buildings, Grumantbyen

Ruins of houses in Grumant. It is dif­fi­cult to iden­ti­fy indi­vi­du­al buil­dings, but it is safe to say that all of the­se houses were built after the war.

1961-62: pro­duc­tion stop and aban­don­ment

Pro­blems with geo­lo­gi­cal faults and decre­a­sing thic­kness and qua­li­ty of the coal seams kept incre­a­sing in 1961. This led to a pro­duc­tion stop in the autumn of 1961. This pro­duc­tion stop was ori­gi­nal­ly meant to be tem­pora­ry as far as is known, but it marks the end of the Rus­si­an dou­ble sett­le­ment of Cole­s­buk­ta and Grumant. 2054 peop­le lived in the Rus­si­an sett­le­ments at that time. For com­pa­ri­son: the total popu­la­ti­on of all sett­le­ments in Spits­ber­gen was 2961. In other words, the Rus­si­an popu­la­ti­on repre­sen­ted by far the majo­ri­ty.

Cole­s­buk­ta and Grumant were aban­do­ned in 1962. Accord­ing to the web­site of the Trust Ark­ti­ku­gol, the total pro­duc­tion in Grumant amounts to 2 mil­li­on tons.

Popu­la­ti­on*The­re­of women/childrenCoal pro­duc­tion (tons)Coal ship­ped (tons)
Win­ter 1946-47??
Sum­mer 1947120
Win­ter 1947-48200?
Sum­mer 194845050000
Sum­mer 1949600, im Herbst 965
Win­ter 1949-501008?/5116642
Sum­mer 19511106?/32
Sum­mer 1952830?/10122107
Sum­mer 1953780?/11
Win­ter 1953-54986?/12120459
Win­ter 1954-55962?/20103210
Win­ter 1955-56958?/17105287
Win­ter 1956-57965?93959
Sum­mer 19581035?73235
Sum­mer 19591047?128918
Sum­mer 1960??125425
Win­ter 1960-61??73727

* Popu­la­ti­on of Grumant tog­e­ther with Cole­s­buk­ta. Most peop­le lived in Grumant, whe­re the mines were loca­ted. Examp­le: in 1949, 48 out of 600 peop­le lived in Cole­s­buk­ta and the others in Grumant.
Not­hing is known for tho­se years that are not men­tio­ned, or just sum­ma­ri­sing data for all the Rus­si­an sett­le­ments tog­e­ther. The­se are men­tio­ned in the text.
Data from Hoel (1966): Sval­bards his­to­rie.

Pan­ora­ma 11 – View over Grum­ant­by­en

Adolf Hoel does not men­ti­on any acci­dents in Grumant or the other Rus­si­an sett­le­ments in Spits­ber­gen until 1965 in his book Sval­bards His­to­rie, which was fina­li­sed by others after his death in ear­ly 1964. In con­trast, he high­ligh­ted the high tech­ni­cal stan­dard of the Rus­si­an mines. The­re is no rea­son to assu­me that Hoel had any rea­son to descri­be the stan­dards and acci­dent histo­ry more favoura­ble than it actual­ly was. On the other hand, it is hard to ima­gi­ne that the­re were never any acci­dents in the Rus­si­an coal mines, while the­re was a num­ber of serious acci­dents, some with lar­ge loss of lives, in the Nor­we­gi­an mines in Lon­gye­ar­by­en and Ny-Åle­sund.

The Rus­si­an name of the for­mer sett­le­ment, Grumant, is deri­ved from the word Grumant, which the Pomors used for Spits­ber­gen. The word “Grumant” bears some simi­la­ri­ty to “Green­land”. In the ear­ly years of its histo­ry, it was belie­ved that Spits­ber­gen was a part of Green­land. Today, Grumant is most­ly known as Grum­ant­by­en, “byen” mea­ning “the town” in Nor­we­gi­an (defi­ni­te mode), as in Lon­gye­ar­by­en.

Source

The pri­ma­ry source was Alfred Hoel’s 3 volu­me stan­dard work Sval­bards His­to­rie, here the chap­ter De Rus­sis­ke Sels­ka­per (Vol. I, pages 331-418). An ela­bo­ra­te book about the Rus­si­an histo­ry of Spits­ber­gen, writ­ten from an insi­de per­spec­ti­ve on expert level, his lacking, as far as I can tell (and I did ask, more than once). The­re is still work to be done here for a Rus­si­an his­to­ri­an. Plea­se don’t hesi­ta­te to let me know if you have more, rele­vant infor­ma­ti­on.

Back

Aussicht über Grumantbyen Westliches Gebäude (innen) Westliches Gebäude (Eingang) Gebäude (innen) »Dorfplatz« Bahntrasse, Grubeneingang Bahntrasse, Stolleneingang Bahntrasse, Wasserkessel Denkmal Östliches Ende der Bahn Grumantbyen

BOOKS, CALENDAR, POSTCARDS AND MORE

This and other publishing products of the Spitsbergen publishing house in the Spitsbergen-Shop.

last modification: 2021-10-21 · copyright: Rolf Stange
css.php