The Norwegian government wants more control on the ground in Svalbard. This has become umistakably clear through a range of political projects, including the ongoing discussion about limitations of public access to large parts of Svalbard and the withdrawal of local voting rights for foreigners.
Housing is another important issue in Longyearbyen. The housing market is difficult, and individuals without strong economics experience serious difficulties when trying to find a place to live. In contrast to elsewhere, you can’t just move a couple of miles out of town and commute by bus. Major employers own living space to make sure their employees can actually live in Longyearbyen.
Housebuilding in central location in Elvesletta, Longyearbyen.
Many of Longyearbyen’s larger employers are public, either directly or indirectly. That includes Sysselmester, the local administration (including school, kindergarten, hospital, …), Store Norske (the mining company), UNIS etc. Some of them own housing space, and in other cases flats are owned and administered by Statsbygg, a public authority that does exactly that: owning, running and developing property on behalf of the government for public institutions and state-owned companies.
Statsbygg does already have a major number of flats in Longyearbyen. This number is now to grow significantly: as Svalbardposten wrote, Statsbygg will invest 173 millionen kroner (currently slightly under 15 million Euro) in housing spaces. The whole block of Elvesletta 2 and 3, which is currently under construction, is concerned, with a total of 27 flats.
In return, Statsbygg will release an equivalent number of flats that are owned by Store Norske. In contrast to Statsbygg, Store Norske can offer them to everybody on the housing market, including private individuals. But also Store Norske is owned by the government, which can thus control who can live in Longyearbyen and who can not live there.
Visitors to Longyearbyen will quickly get the impression that the place is growing madly by means of the large construction sites. But this impression is misleading, because a large number of flats were also lost during and after the catastrophic avalanche of 2015. This loss of living space is obviously less apparent.